IMovie 4 is faster than 3, iPhoto 4 is faster than 3, iTunes 4 is faster than 3.Īpple has showed that they tries to optimize software the most possible, their only requires new machines for new features that irremediably need it, like core image/video in panther. I can say the same for other Apple products, not only Mac Os X.įinal Cut Pro 4 is faster than 3 (More realtime effects in the same machine.) and 3 is faster than 2. I’m a multi-platform guy and I Would like to see this level of optimization in Microsoft Software… Why Office 2004 for Mac is slower than Office v.X? Will be LongHorn.3 nearly as fast as Windows 98? We’ll see. Which isn’t… Than W2K…ġ0.3 is faster than 10.2, 10.2 is a lot faster than 10.1, 10.1 is much faster than 10.0…ġ0.3 is nearly as fast as the older system Mac Os 9…. I was speaking of Windows XP being faster. I wasn’t speaking of W2k being identical in speed to Windows XP. Would this mean that Windows is more optimized for AMD?… The Folks at Intel should be furiousĪnyway. The tests at Tech-Report and Infoworld are using different machines and different processors. The article of Infoworld shows 2 tests, one from an independent company (CSA Research) and one in-house… The tests at Infoworld shows that windows xp and windows 2000 are identical in performance with the optimized theme (w2k), not the default theme… And of course Beos! They only hate Windows, Microsoft, Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer (aka I luv this company) Who to trust more? Tech-What or Infoworld?īecause we all know Infoworld is a biased website fans of Mac and Linux.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |